User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.5 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 (AS00DTV;V;0001;0001)AQUOS-AS/2.0 LC-60LE950X
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sharp.yaml
Espial 6.1.5 Webkit 531.2SharpLE950X Aquos TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Espial 6.1.5close media-playercloseclose0.252 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpLC-60LE950Xtv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.5close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.109 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Espial 6.1.5Webkit 531.2 SharpLE950X Aquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:49 | by ThaDafinser