User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3xxR/97.04.11R MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaRAZRV3xxR Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-RAZRV3xxR 97.04.11Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaRAZRV3xxRmobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaRAZRV3xxRsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaRAZRV3xxRcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.124 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaRAZRV3xxRmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xxRFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:49 | by ThaDafinser