User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; TX17 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.135 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Chrome 36.0Android 4.2unknown IrbisTX17Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.2IrbisTX17Tabletyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.284 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.2PantechTX17smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeAndroid 4.2.2TX17closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.142 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.135WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink Android 4.2.2TX17tabletyescloseclose0.09401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:48 | by ThaDafinser