User agent detail

Lenovo-A880/S100 Linux/3.4.5 Android/4.2 Release/08.07.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit 534.30 Profile/ Configuration;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-365.php
Android 4.2Android 4.2unknown LenovoA880Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.2WebKit Android 4.2LenovoA880Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.265 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LenovoA880smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA880closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit Android 4.2LenovoA880mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:48 | by ThaDafinser