User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; 706K Build/706K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1619.84037
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 25.0Android 4.4unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 25.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1619.84037closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 25.0.1619.84037closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Android 4.4yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1619.84037closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1619closeAndroid 4.4.2706Kcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1619.84037WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 25.0Blink Android 4.4.2706Ktabletyescloseclose0.10601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1619.84037closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:48 | by ThaDafinser