User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120215 Red Hat/3.6-1.el5_7 Firefox/3.6.26
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.26Red Hat 5.7Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.26closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Red Hat 3.6desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.26closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.26closeRed Hat 3.6closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.26closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.26Gecko 20120215Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.26Gecko 1.9.2Red Hat 5.7desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.26closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:48 | by ThaDafinser