User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Lenovo A850 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 YaBrowser/1.1.1364.172 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA850 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 1.1WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex Browser 1.1.1364.172closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA850mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 1.1Blink Android 4.2LenovoA850smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 1.1.1364.172closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 1.1.1364closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA850closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.072 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 1.1.1364.172WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 1.1Webkit 537.22Android 4.2.2LenovoA850mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 30closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA850Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:48 | by ThaDafinser