User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; Avant Browser; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-184.php
Avant 0.0WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avant Trident WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Avant Browser closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Avant Browser Windows Vistadesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Avant 1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Avant Browser closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.211 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Avant Browser Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.365 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:47 | by ThaDafinser