User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; X11; Linux x86_64; Google-StructuredDataTestingTool; +http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-208.php
yesGoogle Structured-Data TestingToolBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle Structured-Data TestingToolBot/Crawler0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.246 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Google+ Snippet Fetcher Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:47 | by ThaDafinser