User agent detail

Dalvik/1.6.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; LIFETAB_S9714 Build/JRO03R)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Dalvik 1.6Android 4.1unknown MedionLifeTab S9714Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dalvik 1.6WebKit Android 4.1MedionLifeTab S9714Tabletyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dalvik 1.6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1MedionLifetab S9714mobile-browseryescloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1MedionLifetab S9714tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1MedionLifetab S9714closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.1.1MedionLifetab S9714tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.1MedionLIFETAB S9714Tabletyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:46 | by ThaDafinser