User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/39.0.2171.65 Chrome/39.0.2171.65 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Chromium 39.0Ubuntu unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 39.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 39.0.2171.65closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 39.0Blink Ubuntu desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 39.0.2171closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.144 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 39.0.2171.65WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 39.0.2171.65Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:46 | by ThaDafinser