User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; InettvBrowser/2.2 (00014A;SonyDTV115;0002;0100) KDL46EX720; CC/POL; xx) Presto/2.7.61 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 2.9 Presto 2.7.61SonyBravia EX720 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL46EX720tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.0closeLinux SonyDTV115closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2Presto 2.7.61Linux Sony KDL-46EX720 Digital TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 2.9Presto 2.7.61 SonyBravia EX720 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:45 | by ThaDafinser