User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Desire L by HTC Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire L by HTC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCCP2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.276 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 31.0Blink Android 4.1HTCsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCDesire L by HTCcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.142 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1HTC Desire Lcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.427 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.1.1HTCDesire Lmobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.1HTCCP2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.08401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:44 | by ThaDafinser