User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S6818_TD/1.0 Android/4.1.2 Release/02.03.2013 Browser/ApplelWebkit/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android Browser Android 4.1.2WebKit SamsungGT-S6818smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-S6818 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Famemobile-browseryescloseclose0.254 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGT-S6818smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-S6818closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.30Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.454 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Famemobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:44 | by ThaDafinser