User agent detail

MobileKeeper/BASIC/1033/ms_wm6professional/01.06.2718.0001 WindowsMobile6/Windows Mobile 6 Professional/HTC/HTC Kaiser Touch/5.2.23519.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCKaiser Touch Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MobileKeeper BASICcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows Mobile 6HTCKaiser Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.228 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows Mobile HTCKaiser Touchsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Mobile HTCKaiser Touchcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Mobile HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows Mobile 6HTCKaiser Touchmobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:44 | by ThaDafinser