User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; xx; NokiaE63)/UC Browser8.5.0.183/28/354/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-symbian.yaml
UC Browser 8.5Series60 3Gecko NokiaE63mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5 Symbian OS Series 60 V3NokiaE63smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0closeSymbian OS NokiaE63closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.5.0.183 NokiaOS NokiaNokia E63closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.5Gecko Series60 3NokiaE63mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:43 | by ThaDafinser