User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; C07000 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 YaBrowser/14.7.1916.15743.00 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 14.7Android 4.4unknown NomiC07000Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.7Blink Android 4.4NomiC07000Tabletyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.7.1916.15743.00closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.278 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.7Blink Android 4.4yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.7.1916.15743.00closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.7.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2C07000closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.114 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.7.1916.15743.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.7Blink Android 4.4.2C07000tabletyescloseclose0.08901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:43 | by ThaDafinser