User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Cat Tablet PHOENIX 8.1J0 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 34.0.1847.114Android 4.2.2Blink CatPHOENIX 8.1J0tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2CatPHOENIX 8.1J0tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2CatTablet PHOENIX 8.1J0closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Phoenix 8.1J0 BuildcloseAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.125 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Phoenix WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.2.2CATPHOENIXtabletyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:43 | by ThaDafinser