User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; zh-cn; itel it1701; Android/4.4.2; Release/06.05.2015) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-810.php
Android 4.4Android 4.4unknown IteliNote PrimeTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.4WebKit Android 4.4IteliNote PrimeTabletyesyes0.06001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.292 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4iTelP750smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.125 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.4.2Mozillamobile:smartyescloseclose0.10001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:42 | by ThaDafinser