User agent detail

Groupon/2.6.2988 (Android 4.0.3; LENOVO A2_3g_data / Lenovo IdeaTab A2107A-H; O2 - de)[preload=false;locale=de_DE;clientidbase=android-lenovo]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA2_3g_data Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Groupon 2.6.2988closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA2 3g datamobile-browseryescloseclose0.39 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA2 3g datasmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA2_3g_datacloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Groupon 2.6 Android 4.0.3LenovoA2 3g datamobile:smartyescloseclose0.20702 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:42 | by ThaDafinser