User agent detail

m2 note/4.5 Linux/3.10.65 Android/5.1 Release/08.17.2015 Browser/Chrome40.0.2214.114 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 40Android 5.1 MeizuM2 Notemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
m2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.114closeAndroid 5.1MeizuM2 Notemobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome WebKit Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notephabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome MIDP-2.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 5.1closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40 Android 5.1MeizuM2 Notemobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 5.1closeAndroid 5.1MeizuM2 NoteSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:41 | by ThaDafinser