User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Ubuntu 14.04) AppleWebKit/537.36 Chromium/35.0.1870.2 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Chromium 35.0Ubuntu 14.04unknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 35.0Blink Ubuntu 14.04Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.36closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 35.0Blink Ubuntu 14.04desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 35.0.1870closeUbuntu 14.4closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 35.0.1870.2WebKit 537.36Linux 14.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.472 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 35.0.1870.2Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:40 | by ThaDafinser