User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.15
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Safari OS X Webkit 538.15desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.15closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.15closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.129 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 538.15Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 538.15OS X desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:40 | by ThaDafinser