User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11; Gecko/20071129; Firefox/2.5.0) Maple 5.1.00277 Navi
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Gecko 1.8.1SamsungSmart TV 2010television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.5.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.229 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.5Gecko Windows Samsungtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.5.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.111 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.5.0Gecko 20071129Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.8.1 SamsungSmart TV 2010televisioncloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:39 | by ThaDafinser