User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-E2252 Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/4.4.29595/34.1000; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Opera Mini 4.4JAVA unknown2.2 SamsungGT-E2252Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 4.4Presto 2.2JAVA SamsungGT-E2252Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 4.4.29595closeJVM SamsungGT-E2252mobile-browseryescloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 4.4Presto SamsungGT-E2252smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 4.4.29595close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 4.4.29595close SamsungGT-E2252closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 4.4.29595close closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 4.4.29595Presto 2.8.119 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 4.4Presto 2.8.119 SamsungMetro 2252mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:39 | by ThaDafinser