User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows ME) Opera 7.11 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Opera 7.11WinME ME1.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 7.11Presto 1.0WinME MEWindows DesktopDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 7.11closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 7.11Presto Windows MEdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 7.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.11closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 7.11closeWindows ME closecloseclosecloseclose0.083 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 7.11 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 7.11 Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 7.54closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:39 | by ThaDafinser