User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2101.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1592.0 (Edition Developer)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Developer 25.0OS X Yosemite 10.10Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 25.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.11201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1592.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 25.0.1592.0closeOS X 10.10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1592.0closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1592closeMac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2101.0closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.187 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1592.0WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Developer 25.0Blink OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1592.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:38 | by ThaDafinser