User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; U; en-us) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.44 like Chrome/37.0.2026.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Silk 3.44Android unknownunknown AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.44Blink Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes0.15701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.44closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.277 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink GNU/Linux AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.44closeLinux AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.44WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.44Blink FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.0closeAndroid 2.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:37 | by ThaDafinser