User agent detail

HTC-PM23300/UCWEB2.7.0.223/49/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCPM23300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-PM23300 UCWEB2.7.0.223closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.7 HTCPM23300smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.7.0close HTCPM23300closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.7.0.223close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.7.0.223 HTC PM23300closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.449 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.7Gecko HTCPM23300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:37 | by ThaDafinser