User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.86 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-855.php
Chrome 46.0Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 46.0Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 46.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2490closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.056 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.86WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 46Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closecompatible Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:36 | by ThaDafinser