User agent detail

MOT-V730/1.0 MIB1.2/v1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaV730 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 1.2 MotorolaV730Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-V730 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close MotorolaV730mobile-browseryescloseclose0.218 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaV730smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV730closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V730closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MotorolaV730mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaV730Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:36 | by ThaDafinser