User agent detail

J-PHONE/4.2/V601SH/SNJSHH1226872 SH/0004aa Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 Ext-Profile/JSCL-1.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
SharpV601SHmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
J-PHONE 4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SharpV601SHmobile-browseryescloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SoftbankV601SHsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SharpV601SHmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile V601SHcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SoftbankV601SHFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:36 | by ThaDafinser