User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian; U; 701; en-GB) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) QtTestBrowser/0.1 Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia701 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close Nokia701closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QtTestBrowser 0.1Webkit 534.3Series60 Nokia701mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:36 | by ThaDafinser