User agent detail

SonyEricssonM1i/R1BA Browser/Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UCWEB8.2.0.116/31/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
UC Browser 8.2Windows Mobile Gecko Sony EricssonAspenmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows SonyEricssonM1amobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Windows CE Sony EricssonAspensmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeWindows CE SonyEricssonM1icloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.116closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.116 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Windows Mobile Sony EricssonAspenmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SonyEricssonM1aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:36 | by ThaDafinser