User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Linux ; xx) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.0.4 en-US;L7200 Version/4.0 Safari/531.2+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/toshiba.yaml
Espial 6.0.4 Webkit 531.2ToshibaRegza L7200 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 6.0WebKit GNU/Linux tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 531.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Espial 6.0.4Webkit 531.2 ToshibaRegza L7200 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:34 | by ThaDafinser