User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; zh-cn; VOTO VT818+ Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
QQ Browser 6.0Android 4.0.3WebKit VotoVT818+smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit Android 4.0VotoVT818+smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.0closeAndroid 4.0.3VOTO VT818+closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 6.0Webkit 537.36Android 4.0.3VOTO VT818+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:34 | by ThaDafinser