User agent detail

nokia6120c/UC Browser7.4.0.65/69/400 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 7.4SymbianOS unknownunknown Nokia6120 ClassicMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.4WebKit SymbianOS Nokia6120 ClassicMobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
nokia6120c UCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.4.0.65closeSeries60 Nokia6120 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.4 Symbian Nokia6120csmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.4.0close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.4.0.65 Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.4Gecko Series60 Nokia6120 classicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:34 | by ThaDafinser