User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iOS; like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) not Chrome/27.0.1500.95 Mobile/10B141 Safari/537.36 Bowser/0.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-768.php
Bowser 0.2iOS unknownunknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Bowser 0.2WebKit iOS AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1500.95closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeOS X generic web browsermobile-browseryescloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 27.0WebKit Mac desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1500.95closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1500close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1500.95closeiPhone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1500.95WebKit 536.36Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 27.0.1500.95Blink OS X desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1500.95closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:33 | by ThaDafinser