User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Opera Mini/7.1.32052/30.3697; en-US; itel_IT1351) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.1.1.420 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Opera Mini 7.1.32052GNU/Linux Presto iTelIT1351smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U2 Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto GNU/Linux iTelIT1351smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.1.420 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Gecko Android iTelIT1351mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:33 | by ThaDafinser