User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; C -) AppleWebKit/527+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/419.3) Webglance/0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-500.php
yesWeb GlanceBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesWeb GlanceBot/Crawler0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 419.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 527closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 527Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56906 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 527Linux desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:32 | by ThaDafinser