User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; Avea inTouch 2 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ZTEAvea inTouch 2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18WebKit Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4ZTEAvea inTouch 2closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.42834 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4AveainTouch 2tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:32 | by ThaDafinser