User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.01; Windows 95)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-ie.yaml
Internet Explorer 3.0.1Windows 95 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 3.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 3.01closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.22302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 3.01Trident Windows 95desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 3.01closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 3.1closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 3.01closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 3.1Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 3.0.1 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 3.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:32 | by ThaDafinser