User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.0; U; IBM EVV/3.0/EAK01AG9/LE; Edition NCSD0; xx) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.62
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 11.62Windows VistaPresto 2.10.229desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.62closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.62Presto Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.62closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.62closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.62closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10.229Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10.229Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.62closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:32 | by ThaDafinser