User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; W200 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.123 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ThlW200 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.2.1ThLW200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.1ThlW200closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.123WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.2.1Cherry MobileW200mobile:smartyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.2ThLW200Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:32 | by ThaDafinser