User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; Nokia N70/2.0536.0.2; 1657) Opera 8.60 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN70 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.21102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto Symbian OS NokiaN70smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.60closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS NokiaN70closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.60 Series60 NokiaN70mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NokiaN70Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:31 | by ThaDafinser