User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S5250/1.0; U; bada/1.0; xx) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.0 Mobile WQVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-bada.yaml
Dolfin 2.0Bada 1.0Webkit 533.1SamsungWave 525mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S5250Mobile Phoneyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeBada SamsungGT-S5250mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S5250smartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S5250closeclosecloseclose0.03 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 533.1 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0Webkit 533.1Bada 1.0SamsungWave 525mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungGT-S5250Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:30 | by ThaDafinser