User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US) AppleWebKit/530.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/2.0.172.0 Safari/530.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 2Windows Server 2003Webkit 530.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 2.0WebKit WinXP 5.2Desktop0.10001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 2.0WebKit Windows Server 2003desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 2.0.172closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 2.0.172.0WebKit 530.4Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 2Webkit 530.4Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 2.0.172.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 2.0.156.1closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:30 | by ThaDafinser