User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) adspider Safari/537.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
adspider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.21closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.21closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesadspiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.21Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.21Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:29 | by ThaDafinser