User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; C5302 Build/12.1.A.1.207) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.82 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 30.0Android 4.3unknown SonyXperia SP HSPAMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.3SonyXperia SP HSPAMobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.3SonyC5302mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.3SonyXperia SPsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.3SonyC5302closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.82WebKit 537.36Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.3SonyXperia SPmobile:smartyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25closeAndroid 4.3SonyC5302Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:29 | by ThaDafinser