User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; fr-FR; ALCATEL_one_touch_818) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
UC Browser 9.5JAVA unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 AlcatelOne Touch 818smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko AlcatelOne Touch 818)mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:28 | by ThaDafinser